Why XRP’s rich list matters more than price right now

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-30Last updated on 2025-12-30

Abstract

XRP's price has dropped nearly 50%, but the key story lies in its supply and ownership structure. Over 6 million wallets hold only small amounts (≤500 XRP), while a significant portion of the supply is locked in escrow or held by a few large wallets. This means the truly liquid, tradable supply is shrinking, as evidenced by declining exchange balances despite heavy selling pressure. The cost to accumulate XRP has also risen sharply, pricing out many retail buyers. Consequently, even a modest return of demand could lead to disproportionately sharp price increases due to the constrained available supply.

Ripple’s XRP may have a large total supply, but most of it isn’t easy to access or trade. Over six million wallets hold only small amounts, while the XRP that can actually move in the market is getting smaller.

If sell pressure falls and demand returns, this gap could become important. Here’s why.

The pressure to sell is HIGH!

XRP is facing heavy selling after a price drop. The token has fallen nearly 50%, sliding from highs around $3.66 to near $1.85.

This move was followed by a clear rise in Exchange Inflows, especially to Binance, which handles the largest share of XRP trading.

After weeks of relatively stable activity, inflows picked up from the 15th of December. Daily Transfers to Binance jumped to between 35 million and 116 million XRP, so there was increased intent to sell.

At the same time, total XRP held on exchanges has continued to fall, now sitting near 1.5 billion XRP. Traders are selling into weakness, even with the overall exchange supply shrinking.

Retail holds less, costs keep rising

The way XRP is distributed helps explain who is feeling it most.

Recent data showed that more than 6 million wallets hold 500 XRP or fewer, placing most participants at the small-holder end of the spectrum. Meanwhile, wallets holding millions of XRP are few in number but control a large share of the supply.

On paper, XRP’s circulating supply looks large, but the headline supply figures overstate how much XRP is actually liquid and tradable.

XRP has also become far more expensive to accumulate. Buying 1,000 XRP now costs around $1,750, up from roughly $500 a little over a year ago. This rising entry cost limits how much new retail can buy during pullbacks.

At the same time, a significant portion of XRP is escrowed or functionally locked within the ledger through account reserves, network states, and protocol-level requirements. This reduces the amount that can freely move in the market.

The result is a big gap.

Smaller wallets hold less, while buying requires capital that many retail participants simply do not have. With retail mostly priced out and a lot of XRP not freely available, even a small rise in demand could make a tighter market much faster.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP is under heavy sell pressure, but exchange balances are down – supply is shrinking.
  • Even modest demand could trigger sharp price moves.

Related Questions

QWhy does the article suggest that XRP's rich list matters more than its price right now?

ABecause while XRP price has dropped significantly, the actual liquid supply available for trading is shrinking due to factors like escrow and high accumulation costs, meaning the distribution of holdings among large and small wallets has a greater impact on market dynamics than the current price.

QWhat evidence does the article provide for increased selling pressure on XRP?

AThe article points to a clear rise in Exchange Inflows, particularly to Binance, with daily transfers jumping to between 35 million and 116 million XRP starting from December 15th, indicating a heightened intent to sell.

QHow is the XRP supply distribution described, and what is its significance?

AOver 6 million wallets hold 500 XRP or less, placing most participants as small holders, while a small number of wallets holding millions of XRP control a large share of the supply. This means the headline circulating supply figure overstates the amount of XRP that is actually liquid and easily tradable.

QWhat two main factors are limiting new retail investors from accumulating XRP?

AThe rising entry cost, as buying 1,000 XRP now costs around $1,750 compared to $500 a year ago, and a significant portion of XRP being locked in escrow or due to protocol-level requirements, reducing the freely available supply.

QAccording to the article's final thoughts, what could happen even with modest demand?

AEven modest demand could trigger sharp price moves because the available supply on exchanges is shrinking while a large portion of the total supply is not freely tradable, making the market tighter.

Related Reads

Vitalik May Not Realize That Ethereum's Transition to PoS Actually Buried a Financial 'Hidden Bomb'

After transitioning from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), Ethereum introduced staking rewards for ETH, creating a "maturity mismatch" arbitrage opportunity with Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs). This led to leveraged lending, recursive borrowing, and yield arbitrage on platforms like Aave, becoming a major DeFi use case—similar to traditional finance’s reliance on arbitrage. However, this arbitrage does not generate additional liquidity or value for the Ethereum ecosystem. Instead, it creates persistent selling pressure, as institutions cash out their staking rewards. This dynamic forms a delicate balance between sell pressure, ETH buy demand, and deflationary mechanisms. Unlike traditional banking, where maturity mismatch helps transform savings into productive capital (e.g., long-term loans funding economic growth), DeFi’s version is purely speculative. Institutions engage in recursive staking—staking ETH via Lido to get stETH, using it as collateral on Aave to borrow more ETH, and repeating the process—amplifying staking yields without contributing to real economic activity or dApp development. This套利套利behavior essentially exploits Ethereum’s security budget. With over 34 million ETH staked—far exceeding the estimated 15 million needed to resist state-level attacks—the network experiences "excess security." Post-Dencun upgrade, with reduced gas fees and renewed ETH inflation, the selling pressure from staking rewards structurally suppresses ETH’s price. ETH’s staking yield, currently around 2.5%, trails behind U.S. Treasury yields, making ETH a less attractive asset institutionally. The rise of Real-World Assets (RWA) on-chain could create external demand, potentially boosting ETH’s value, but for now, the PoS shift has turned ETH into a perpetual bond with negative yield spread versus Treasuries, posing a financial risk rather than fostering organic growth.

marsbit53m ago

Vitalik May Not Realize That Ethereum's Transition to PoS Actually Buried a Financial 'Hidden Bomb'

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片